Another unarmed white person has been killed by police but corporate media will not highlight these cases out of fear of critical masses of white people joining the movement against police violence.
O_ama has no moral right to lecture Africans on democracy, human rights, and clean government because his country has been sponsoring corrupt and cruel policies against black people at home and thieving tyrants on our continent.
Like all imperial powers before it, the US seeks to dominate the world in order to exploit it. This is how it sustains her greedy consumption.
But to disguise its intentions, the US rewrites history, employs selective indignation, and chooses arbitrary priorities to present its selfish agenda.
O_ama being of African ancestry is the best puppet the US uses to disguise its contempt for Africans. Read more at Africa to O_ama: Mind your own business
“I was doing summer school at Columbia University and I shared a room with a basketball player in a frat house. My roommate and I were two very different people. I was, as one friend coined, “the stoned Muslim”, but otherwise a neat freak. He was your stereotypical conservative Texan, and a total slob. One time, I asked him to stop leaving half-eaten bowls of cereal on the floor. He told me ‘This is how I live, you know. I like it like this.’ That did it for him? Old milk/young cheese waiting to be tipped over on the floor? Was that some kind of fucked up frat boy feng shui?”
“Anyway, we worked together on paying that rent. I had some rinky dink summer job on campus, but much of the meager proceeds went to upkeeping the ‘stoned’ part of my moniker. Luckily there were always psychological experiments going…
View original post 66 more words
” The Jews were responsible for bringing negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level”
“For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and negroids all ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized future for our humanity would be lost forever.” (311)
” Therefore, the cultural level is not the standard by which we can judge the value of the State in which that people lives. It is evident that a people which is endowed with high creative powers in the cultural sphere is of more worth than a tribe of negroes. And yet the statal organization of the former, if judged from the standpoint of efficiency, may be worse than that of the negroes.”
“One example will suffice to show how much our contemporary world is at fault in this matter. From time to time our illustrated papers publish, for the edification of the German philistine, the news that in some quarter or other of the globe, and for the first time in that locality, a Negro has become a lawyer, a teacher, a pastor, even a grand opera tenor or something else of that kind. While the bourgeois blockhead stares with amazed admiration at the notice that tells him how marvellous are the achievements of our modern educational technique, the more cunning Jew sees in this fact a new proof to be utilized for the theory with which he wants to infect the public, namely that all men are equal.It does not dawn on the murky bourgeois mind that the fact which is published for him is a sin against reason itself, that it is an act of criminal insanity to train a being who is only an anthropoid by birth until the pretence can be made that he has been turned into a lawyer; while, on the other hand, millions who belong to the most civilized races have to remain in positions which are unworthy of their cultural 347 level.The bourgeois mind does not realize that it is a sin against the will of the eternal Creator to allow hundreds of thousands of highly gifted people to remain floundering in the swamp of proletarian misery while Hottentots and Zulus are drilled to fill positions in the intellectual professions. For here we have the product only of a drilling technique, just as in the case of the performing dog. If the same amount of care and effort were applied among intelligent races each individual would become a thousand times more capable in such matters.” (349)
” Systematically these negroid parasites in our national body corrupt our innocent fair-haired girls and thus destroy something which can no longer be replaced in this world.” (451)
“The French people, who are becoming more and more obsessed by negroid ideas, represent a threatening menace to the existence of the white race in Europe, because they are bound up with the Jewish campaign for world-domination. For the contamination caused by the influx of negroid blood on the Rhine, in the very heart of Europe, is in accord with the sadist and perverse lust for vengeance on the part of the hereditary enemy of our people, just as it suits the purpose of the cool calculating Jew who would use this means of introducing a process of bastardization in the very centre of the European Continent and, by infecting the white race with the blood of an inferior stock, would destroy the foundations of its independent existence.” (501)
“We National Socialists have to go still further. The right to territory may become a duty when a great nation seems destined to go under unless its territory be extended. And that is particularly true when the nation in question is not some little group of negro people but the Germanic mother of all the life which has given cultural shape to the modern world.” (525)
“It does not dawn upon this depraved bourgeois world that here one has actually to do with a sin against all reason; that it is a criminal absurdity to train a born half-ape until one believes a lawyer has been made of him, while millions of members of the highest culture race have to remain in entirely unworthy positions; that it is a sin against the will of the eternal Creator to let hundreds and hundreds of thousands of His most talented beings degenerate in the proletarian swamp of today, while Hottentots and Zulu Kafirs are trained for intellectual vocations. For it is training, exactly as that of the poodle, and not a scientific ‘education’.”
“In the most critical hour of our people, in the moment when we, practically abandoned by all the world, made defenseless by our own fault, have to watch France setting out to occupy new territories, while African negroes rape our women and children,…”
“The black disgrace works havoc on the Rhine. Women, girls and children pay for the bestial negroes’ lust with their death. An uninterrupted stream of poison and disease flows into the blood of our people. Moroccan syphilis drives thousands of victims towards a cruel death…”
“All great cultures of the past perished only because the originally creative race died off through blood poisoning.”
“…and one seeks compensation by success with Hottentots and Zulu Kafirs, with the blessing of the Church. While our European peoples, the Lord be praised and thanked, fall into a state of physical and moral leprosy, the pious missionary wanders to Central Africa and establishes negro missions, till there our ‘higher culture’ will have turned healthy, though primitive and inferior, human children into a foul breed of bastards.”
“What we see before us of human culture today, the results of art, science, and techniques, is almost exclusively the creative produce of the Aryan….Without this possibility of utilizing inferior men, the Aryan would never have been able to take the first steps towards his later culture; exactly as, without the help of various suitable animals which he knew how to tame, he would never have arrived at a technology which now allows him to do without these very animals. The words ‘Der Mohr hat seine Schuldigkeit getan, er kann gehen’ (The Moor has done his duty, he may go) has [sic] unfortunately too deep a meaning.”
“For the establishment of superior types of civilization the members of inferior races formed one of the most essential pre-requisites. They alone could supply the lack of mechanical means without which no progress is possible. It is certain that the first stages of human civilization were not based so much on the use of tame animals as on the employment of human beings who were members of an inferior race. Only after subjugated races were employed as slaves was a similar fate allotted to animals, and not vice versa, as some people would have us believe.At first it was the conquered enemy who had to draw the plough and only afterwards did the ox and horse take his place. Nobody else but puling pacifists can consider this fact as a sign of human degradation. Such people fail to recognize that this evolution had to take place in order that man might reach that degree of civilization which these apostles now exploit in an attempt to make the world pay attention to their rigmarole.The progress of mankind may be compared to the process of ascending an infinite ladder. One does not reach the higher level without first having climbed the lower rungs. The Aryan therefore had to take that road which his sense of reality pointed out to him and not that which the modern pacifist dreams of.The path of reality is, however, difficult and hard to tread; yet it is the only one which finally leads to the goal where the others envisage mankind in their dreams. But the real truth is that those dreamers help only to lead man away from his goal rather than towards it. It was not by mere chance that the first forms of civilization arose there where the Aryan came into contact with inferior races, subjugated them and forced them to obey his command.The members of the inferior race became the first mechanical tools in the service of a growing civilization. Thereby the way was clearly indicated which the Aryan had to follow. As a conqueror, he subjugated inferior races and turned their physical powers into organized channels under his own leadership, forcing them to follow his will and purpose.By imposing on them a useful, though hard, manner of employing their powers he not only spared the lives of those whom he had conquered but probably made their lives easier than these had been in the former state of so-called ‘freedom’. While he ruthlessly maintained his position as their master, he not only remained master but he also maintained and advanced civilization. For this depended exclusively on his inborn abilities and, therefore, on the preservation of the Aryan race as such.As soon, however, as his subject began to rise and approach the level of their conqueror, a phase of which ascension was probably the use of his language, the barriers that had distinguished master from servant broke down. The Aryan neglected to maintain his own racial stock 239 unmixed and therewith lost the right to live in the paradise which he himself had created. He became submerged in the racial mixture and gradually lost his cultural creativeness, until he finally grew, not only mentally but also physically, more like the aborigines whom he had subjected rather than his own ancestors.” (240)
Churchill mistakenly believed that Aryans were white. He also “learned” at school that Britain’s colonies were the superior “white” man was conquering the primitive, dark-skinned natives, and bringing them the benefits of civilisation. Later, as an MP he demanded a rolling programme of more conquests, based on his belief that “the Aryan stock is bound to triumph”.
Britain’s Monster Unleashed
As soon as he could, Churchill charged off to take his part in “a lot of jolly little wars against barbarous peoples”. He charged through imperial atrocities, defending each in turn.
The Noble Savage
In the Swat valley, now part of Pakistan, he gladly took part in raids that laid waste to whole valleys, destroying houses and burning crops. He then sped off to help reconquer the Sudan, where he bragged that he personally shot at least three “savages”.
Concentration Camps- Mass Killing Dutch & Africans
When concentration camps were built in South Africa, for white Boers, he said they produced “the minimum of suffering”. The death toll was almost 28,000, and when at least 115,000 black Africans were likewise swept into British camps, where 14,000 died, he wrote only of his “irritation that Kaffirs [Niggers] should be allowed to fire on white men”. Later, he boasted of his experiences there: “That was before war degenerated. It was great fun galloping about.”
Religious Hatred Against Christians
As Colonial Secretary in the 1920s, he unleashed the notorious Black and Tan thugs on Ireland’s Catholic civilians.
Saddam Hussein’s Inspiration to Gas Kurds
When the Kurds rebelled against British rule, he said: “I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes…[It] would spread a lively terror.”
Engineered Famine & Genocide in India
When Mahatma Gandhi launched his campaign of peaceful resistance, Churchill raged that he “ought to be lain bound hand and foot at the gates of Delhi, and then trampled on by an enormous elephant with the new Viceroy seated on its back.” As the resistance swelled, he announced: “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.” This hatred killed.
In 1943 a famine broke out in Bengal, caused – as the Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen has proved – by the imperial policies of the British. Up to 3 million people starved to death while British officials begged Churchill to direct food supplies to the region. He bluntly refused. He raged that it was their own fault for “breeding like rabbits”. At other times, he said the plague was “merrily” culling the population.
Skeletal, half-dead people were streaming into the cities and dying on the streets, but Churchill – to the astonishment of his staff – had only jeers for them. This rather undermines the claims that Churchill’s imperialism was motivated only by an altruistic desire to elevate the putatively lower races.
Nazis, by Comparison
The NSDAP (“Nazis”), fought a war that lasted a few years. Churchill’s horrors spanned decades. Hitler’s Germany fought a war on two West Asian (“European”) fronts. Churchill’s England’s atrocities spanned 3 continents. There really is no comparison. The Prime Minister meets with the monarch regularly, so the King and later Queen obviously approved and encouraged these activities. England is incomparably worse than the worse you’ve heard about Nazi Germany.
Success Is The Best Revenge
This, in turn, led to the great irony of Churchill’s life. In resisting Germany, he produced some of the richest prose-poetry in defence of freedom and democracy ever written. It was a cheque he didn’t want black or Asian people to cash – but they refused to accept that the Bank of Justice was empty. As the Ghanaian nationalist Kwame Nkrumah wrote: “All the fair, brave words spoken about freedom that had been broadcast to the four corners of the earth took seed and grew where they had not been intended.” Churchill lived to see democrats across Britain’s dominions and colonies – from nationalist leader Aung San in Burma to Jawarlal Nehru in India – use his own intoxicating words against him.
Ultimately, the words of the great and glorious Churchill who resisted dictatorship overwhelmed the works of the cruel and cramped Churchill who tried to impose it on the darker-skinned peoples of the world. The fact that we now live in a world where a free and independent India is a superpower eclipsing Britain, and a grandson of the Kikuyu “savages” is the most powerful man in the world, is a repudiation of Churchill at his ugliest – and a sweet, ironic victory for Churchill at his best.
Xenophobia in Europe is a farce*. Due to a shrinking, ageing population and broke governments, “Europe” has a DEMAND for cheap and “free” (slave) labor.
‘Make them work for free’
Asylum seekers in Italy may have to work for free, Italy’s interior minister told local mayors on Thursday, reminding them of a controversial decree issued several months ago.
“We must ask the municipalities to apply our directive and make migrants work for free… Rather than leave them with nothing to do, they should make them work,” Angelino Alfano said, according to the Italian media.
The interior ministry’s civil and immigration rights chief Mario Morcone said asylum seekers working for “the public good”, for example on environmental projects, would only need their insurance covered.
Until they are recognised as refugees, asylum seekers, whose claims can take up to two years to be processed, do not have the right to work for money in Italy.
Refugees help fill gaps in German labour market
Refugees are increasingly in demand from companies desperate to find young trainees, particularly in manual jobs and skilled labour in a country with a fast ageing society and a low birth rate.
And there are increasing calls in industry to change legislation to make it easier for them to be integrated into the labour market.
The challenge is to combat an ever-increasing shortage of skilled labour.
In and around Augsburg, unemployment stood at 4.2 percent in June, and 5,000 vacancies remain unfilled. And here, as elsewhere, the shortage of apprenticeships was even more alarming.
The German “dual system” of on-the-job training combined with theoretical learning is no longer attracting sufficient numbers of young people, with as many as 80,000 trainee places left unfilled last year.
Germans have to learn to view the new arrivals as “the workforce which we increasingly need,” two government ministers wrote recently in a newspaper article.
Until now, asylum-seekers have not been allowed to work for nine months after they arrive in Germany. But the time limit was shortened to three months last November.
Since January, the federal labour agency has granted permits to more than 6,000 asylum-seekers allowing them to work.
* The difference between a “white” racist and a “white” supremacist is the difference between a tool and an operator, a laborer who gets some benefit from the system, and the industrialist who reaps the lion’s share, a Tea Partier vs. the Koch brothers, rednecks vs. aristocrats, etc.
The supremacist view from the mountaintop is that racists are useful idiots, who have to know their place as much as “blacks” do to keep things going. And don’t fall for the exceptional exception and/or token negro- profit is by margins.
This isn’t a criticism of single mothers- it’s a criticism of what some single mothers do wrong with their sons. Not all situations are the same. Sometimes both parents are “to blame”. Sometimes no one is. Everyone loses at the blame game. It’s time to take an honest, non-judgmental look at emotional abuse and the cycle of broken lives it perpetuates. )I want this to be a balanced posts of do’s and don’ts, but I don’t know any single mothers well, so put positives in the comments and I’ll insert them into the article!)
According to the author Shawn James*, “contrary to the belief of most feminists and liberals, a woman CANNOT be a mother and a father to a boy. Nor can she raise a boy to become a man. Only a man can teach a man how to be a Real Man.” Here is a summary of his analyses and observations. (Some points assume the father can, would, and should be in his son’s life, which isn’t always the case. Read the full article here.)
- Speaking negatively about their father. The boy grows up doubting himself. They think that there’s something wrong with them.
- Saying negative things about men. This makes little boys afraid of embracing their masculinity and their male identity.
- Teaching their sons to disrespect their fathers’ authority. Boys growing up to disrespect of their fathers have no respect for all other men in society.
- Teaching their sons to disrespect male authority and male authority figures. This is why many boys who come from single parent homes have a hard time adjusting to the real world.
- Projecting anger at the father onto the son. These emotionally abusive blows knock boys down for the count emotionally before they even get up to become men.
- Not allowing their father to see them. Boys need that relationship with their father to gain a sense of themselves and to understand their masculinity and male identity.
- Bringing in substitutes for a father. Oftentimes he winds up just as overwhelmed and frustrated as the single mother is because he has no understanding of the family’s history or the previous history of the child.
- Coddling their sons. Their sons never grow up learning they have to take responsibility for their actions.
- Inconsistent discipline. Boys never learn that for every action there will be the same reaction every time.
- Teaching boys to be emotional. This loss of self-control can cause him to be seen as weak by other men and make him a target for the abuses of both predatory men and women.
- Not teaching their sons what boundaries are. They don’t know when they’ve gone TOO FAR. They violate people’s personal space. And they can’t take NO for an answer.
- Not teaching their sons coping skills. When things like rejection, failure and loss come into their lives they don’t grieve, hurt for a while and move on like Real Men do.
- Establishing a co-dependent relationship. They use their sons to get their emotional and other needs met it literally sucks the life out of these boys, preventing them from growing up to become healthy, functional men who can have a relationship with women his own age.
- Smothering. All it leads to is him growing up dependent on women for his existence.
- Bullying. Single mothers often use threats, intimidation and verbal abuse to control their sons because they become frustrated when they act in masculine ways they don’t understand.
- Trying to run his life. Boys have grow up and learn how to do things for themselves if they’re going to survive out there.
- Thinking she can raise a man be a man on her terms. There are only some lessons a man can teach a boy about life, and women need to understand this.
- Trying to turn their sons into “Perfect” people. Boys who grow up to become men who are afraid of taking risks. Men who are always playing it safe. Men who are nothing more than cowards.
- Not encouraging them or supporting them in their quest to become independent men. without that boy to maintain that co-dependent relationship with them, they’ll wither away and die pathetic lonely women. Or worse, they fear that their sons will find out the TRUTH regarding the relationship between her and his father.
- Not encouraging boys to embrace their masculinity. By emasculating him and destroying his masculinity and male identity, she hopes to get back at that man who she thinks did her wrong.
- Not encouraging boys to embrace their sexuality. there was nothing wrong with sex. There was just something wrong with the way she had relationships with men that led to her having bad experiences.
- Misleading boys about Male/female relationships. The Single mother may want a man who is their friend after her failed relationships with men. But younger women who are functional and want a good relationship DO NOT want their man to be their best friend.
- Telling boys that all women are whores. The goal of this shaming language is to make the boy back away from a possibly healthy relationship with a woman outside of her and continue maintaining a co-dependent relationship they have with each other.
- Sabotaging his relationships with women. Single mothers hate their sons having girlfriends because they fear that as he gets closer to this woman, he’ll start establishing healthy boundaries that will sever the emotional hose they have hooked up to them.
It takes two to make a woman a single mother. Fathers have a role to play. I’m not judging anybody. I will say, though, that every parent who wishes the best for their children will do everything, looking past their pride, their past, their needs and their pain, to give them the best chance in life by avoiding obvious mistakes.
* Freelance Writer. Here’s his explanation of his post, in the comments to the original article:
I’m not implying anything. I’m just stating the facts.
Let’s look at the statistics in the Black community which is 70 percent single mothers and 70 percent of all births are out of wedlock:
- 70 Percent of all Black males born to single mothers wind up dropping out of school before they finish High School (Some even quit Junior High schoo,)
- 70 Percent of all Black males born to single mothers usually wind up in some type of trouble with the criminal justice system before they turn 18,
- 70 percent of all Black males Born to single mothers wind up incarcerated,
- 70 Percent of all Black males born to single mothers usually wind up unemployable.
When boys are born to a single mother they’re usually put on a road to destruction.
One of my family members is a NYC school teacher and sees the dysfunction and chaos caused in the lives of boys due to living in these single parent female headed homes. These boys are insecure and act out because there is no man there to meet his emotional needs.
Why are boys today softer and more effeminate than in previous generations? Why do they attach themselves to images of males on TV? Because THERE IS NO FATHER IN THE HOME TO MODEL MANHOOD FOR THEM.
You do need a father to raise a son. Only a man can teach another man to be a man. Now I’m sorry if things with the man you chose to be with didn’t work out, but without a positive male in a boy’s life he is not getting what he needs emotionally and mentally to grow up to become a functional adult.
A woman CANNOT teach a boy to become a man because she DOES NOT KNOW what it is to BE A MAN or what a MAN will face in the world.
I grew up with a part-time Dad and now I’m just realizing what I missed out on because I didn’t have a man in my life full-time to teach me about manhood. This piece was to let know women know the numerous ways they harm their sons by depriving them of a father.